Back to discover

Protein / target

Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase

Encoded byTDO2P48775Homo sapiensSwiss-Prot
Small-molecule tractable
Druggability
Structure with Ligand
2
Research papers

Protein at a glance

Biological role

L-tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase

Strongest disease association

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Via encoding gene TDO2 · Literature evidence · score 0.12

Research activity

Emerging research

2 papers · latest 2020

Derived from structured UniProt, Open Targets and literature data on this page.

Protein profile

UniProt 2026_02

Canonical identity and biological annotation from UniProt.

Function overview

Heme-dependent dioxygenase that catalyzes the oxidative cleavage of the L-tryptophan (L-Trp) pyrrole ring and converts L-tryptophan to N-formyl-L-kynurenine.

View complete UniProt function annotation

Heme-dependent dioxygenase that catalyzes the oxidative cleavage of the L-tryptophan (L-Trp) pyrrole ring and converts L-tryptophan to N-formyl-L-kynurenine. Catalyzes the oxidative cleavage of the indole moiety

Domains and Gene Ontology detail (13)

Gene Ontology

  • Ccytosol
  • Famino acid binding
  • Fheme binding
  • Fidentical protein binding
  • FL-tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase activity
  • Fmetal ion binding
  • Foxygen binding
  • PL-tryptophan catabolic process to acetyl-CoA
  • PL-tryptophan catabolic process to L-kynurenine
  • Pprotein homotetramerization
  • Presponse to cortisol
  • Presponse to ethanol

406 aa · 48 kDa

Translational evidence

Open Targets 26

Why this target matters therapeutically, strongest evidence first. Disease associations are gene-level (via the gene that encodes this protein) and open into the full confidence synthesis; the development universe, tractability and safety annotations are target-level, from Open Targets.

Strongest disease associations · via encoding gene TDO2

Gene-level evidence surfaced through the gene TDO2that encodes this protein — not a direct protein–disease relationship. Ranked by Forefront's causal-directness weighting, so genetically- and clinically-evidenced diseases lead over ones that merely share the literature.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
0.20Preliminary

Literature evidence dominant · Open Targets 0.12 · no direct causal or clinical evidence

Neoplasms
0.13Preliminary

Literature evidence dominant · Open Targets 0.10 · no direct causal or clinical evidence

Breast Neoplasms
0.12Preliminary

Literature evidence dominant · Open Targets 0.10 · no direct causal or clinical evidence

Alzheimer's Disease
0.11Preliminary

Literature evidence dominant · Open Targets 0.09 · no direct causal or clinical evidence

Glioma
0.11Preliminary

Literature evidence dominant · Open Targets 0.09 · no direct causal or clinical evidence

View evidence synthesis (5)
Carcinoma, HepatocellularPreliminary
0.20
agreement 0.010.39
Literature63%RNA expression37%

Open Targets aggregate 0.12 · 2 independent evidence families · no direct causal or clinical evidence

NeoplasmsPreliminary
0.13
agreement 0.000.40
Literature100%

Open Targets aggregate 0.10 · 1 independent evidence family · no direct causal or clinical evidence

Breast NeoplasmsPreliminary
0.12
agreement 0.000.39
Literature100%

Open Targets aggregate 0.10 · 1 independent evidence family · no direct causal or clinical evidence

Alzheimer's DiseasePreliminary
0.11
agreement 0.000.30
Literature97%RNA expression3%

Open Targets aggregate 0.09 · 2 independent evidence families · no direct causal or clinical evidence

GliomaPreliminary
0.11
agreement 0.000.38
Literature100%

Open Targets aggregate 0.09 · 1 independent evidence family · no direct causal or clinical evidence

The evidence agreement range shows how closely the independent evidence families agree — it is not a statistical confidence interval, and nothing here is fitted to outcome data. Derived from Open Targets evidence types under Forefront weighting; the per-type scores above show the calculation.

Show all associations
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular0.12
Neoplasms0.10
Breast Neoplasms0.10
Alzheimer's Disease0.09
Glioma0.09
Central Nervous System Neoplasms0.09
Colonic Neoplasms0.09
Carcinoma, Renal Cell0.09

Tractability

Small moleculesEmerging

Feasibility evidence (structure with ligand and high-quality ligand) — no clinical-stage drug of this modality recorded.

AntibodiesEmerging

Feasibility evidence (human protein atlas loc) — no clinical-stage drug of this modality recorded.

Protein degradersEmerging

Feasibility evidence (half-life data and small molecule binder) — no clinical-stage drug of this modality recorded.

View underlying tractability evidence (6)
SM · Structure with LigandSM · High-Quality LigandSM · Druggable FamilyAB · Human Protein Atlas locPR · Half-life DataPR · Small Molecule Binder

Raw Open Targets tractability assessment buckets, by modality.

Research activity

2 papers · to 2020

Papers linked directly to this protein. This is the protein's own literature — descriptor-derived papers are kept separate below.

Most cited

Opitz CA · British journal of cancer · 2020

Recent

Europe PMC papers linked directly to this protein.